I have not been able to post for a few days because I decided to eliminate (toss) my cookies on my computer and unfortunately disrupted my acceess to my blog.  In other words, I was experiencing a tech problem, but I've been able to resolve it, hopefully, and will be back with some more views on politics, econmics and the general idiocy of the Left.  With the all the politics going on now, I have a lot to comment on in the next two to three months.  Obama, the Clintons and the Democrat Congress will keep me busy enough by themselves.

How are libs in Congress qualified to bailout the sub prime scandal?  Simple, they're as incompetent as those they are bailing out.  The criteria to be a liberal is very low, all you have to be is more ill-informed and a bigger choader head than those you are are preaching against.  It's so reassuring to see tha the boobs in Congress still don't get it.  After causing the sub prime problem, they reward and hold blameless the very people who should never have received the loans in the first place.  Is it because they see kindred spirits in the incompetents who default?  Congressional liberals are always defaulting on their socialist programs, then demanding more money from us in the form of taxes in order to bail themselves out; even though the increased taxes reduce the frequency of activity and lead to less revenue from extortion than they predicted using static analysis.  Then why not bail out their equals in the general public to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars?  The House and the Senate are giving a big wet kiss to people who only received loans from lending institutions under pressure from Congress, who will now be rewarded for their failure later this week.  Call or email your Senator and representative throughout this week in order to defeat the wet kiss before it becomes law.  We did it, several times, during the defeats we gave to Congress during immigration reform.  The next step is to have the libs in Congress give their own buts a big wet kiss on the way out the door after November 5th.  Maybe the door smacking them on their buts and the back of their heads at the same time will actually stimulate competent thought at last.     

Gen Clark says McCain being a fighter pilot and a P.O.W. for five years does not qualify him to be President.  Barack,  what did you do at the same time in your life?  It certainly wasn't being put through real torture.  Again, the liberal Democrats attack a Republican, turn a strength (in this case, of character and standing up to adversity) and try to deminish it to insignificance or into a liability by someone other than the Democrat candidate.  This allows the Democrat candidate to triangulate himself above it all, while letting his agents continue the attacks.  As good as Obama is with prepared rhetoric, he doesn't have the slick, smooth dance moves of  Bill Clinton and we are getting tired of the old "how can we fool them today" song and dance of the Left.  They have done this since the Clinton administration as they raise their candidate above the muck raking carried out by other liberals.  It's turning into its own form of a long range torture, of the truth. 

Thanks Lady Logician.  The Trib should read Hamilton, then extract communal head from their backside!  First, they need to fire their own editors for not checking with the founding fathers, instead of contemplaiting their navels from the inside.  There was no army of any magnitude at the time of the Constitutional Convention or during its ratification (see Federalist Paper 29, you idiots) and Hamilton emphasized the appointment of the officers of the militia exclusively by the states, another party to the Constitution along with the people, to placate the states' fears of the new Federal government possibly using the various state militias against the states by marching those militias state to state and against individual citizens.  Even before the Constitution, none of the then colonies had anything to do with the organizing of the Minute Men militias who faced the British at Lexington.  That was done, brace yourselves, by the individuals who stood up to the British Empire and started the War of Independence.  These citizens, the People of the United States, wanted to protect their natural right to keep and bear arms while at the same time possibly put together a national militia to at least supplement the army or be a substitute to and the best possible security against it (see my post on Reasonableness and the Courts from today just after 7PM and Lady Logician's post at about the same time).  Their right to keep and bear arms and to protect themselves and their neighbors proceeded the writing of the Constitution and were then formerly protected by the Second Amendment.  It's all about individual rights, just like the people today have the right not to listen to imbeciles like the one who wrote the article in question and the subpar editor who didn't properly fact check him.  No wonder the liberal newspapers are losing readership, the ailment is self-inflicted.  Shove away.