About Me

Name: Marked in Pgh
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Terrorist-in-Chief Obama Does A Dry Run Over NYC

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:01:48 PM
The fiasco which is Obama pulled off another Bozo the Clown routine at the end of his 100 days in infamy.  Rush might be right, Obama might be the next terrorist attack on America.  But why stop with just one act of terrorism?  he's already buzzed the financial section of the Economy on a continuous basis since his first day in office.  This included having his hench men "Make them an offer they couldn't refuse," behind closed doors to top banks.  They did that by forcing major banks to take TARP money or face more harrassing regualtions.  Obama proved quite adept on his own with his criticisms of executives at AIG while having his ACORN minions go out on terrorist demonstrations outside of the AIG scape goats' homes. 
 
At the same time, he attacks the auto makers (only the Amnerican based, UAW crippled Big 3) for having and using private jets, then fires the CEO of General Motors and forces GM into barkruptcy and allows the unions, the cancer eating away at it, to take over the company.  His terror tactics even scared politically correct Starbucks to cancel their new corporate jet and put more Americans out of work whose companies were providing the components to that project.  But only the government bureaucrats can have private jets. 
 
Now how can one of the few still allowed by political correctness to have a private jet (two of them, in fact), allow one of them to buzz NYC's financial district in what may end up being a dry run for even more terrorist attacks on Wall Street?  If President Obama can do it, then it can only inspire Osama to try again; no matter what excuses he and his demented Mafia offer up for the incident.  Incidentally, how can Obama not sign off on the use of his personal jet and at the same time say he learned about the incident at the moment the rest of us did, on TV? 
 
Pinochio is clearly lying, as his nose gets longer.  I suppose Dumbo's ears are getting bigger as well, to support more ear tags in the new budget.  No wonder his approval rating as President is lower than George W. Bush at this point in office and only one point above Bill Clinton's rating back in 1993. 
 
With the Pravda Press covering his back, what will be his next act of terrorism?    
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Plant This in the Seat of Your Consciousness

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:28:06 PM
There is something abhorrent to me to find out today is not only the PA Primaries but also Earth Day.  Both are supposed to be observed by the general public, but only acted upon by a small minority of that public.  The difference is the Pennsylvania Primary is a necessary part of the election process and Earth Day is a propaganda ploy redesigned over time to promote a lie. 
 
The first Earth Day was created partly to promote Global Cooling, a liberal hysteria of the time.  By the late Seventies the news media were stating that the average, annual temperatures during the last ice age were only a few degrees cooler than they were at that time.
 
Times change.  The news media found they could not scare the general public with the effects of possible Global Cooling because of the general warming trends in the weather (caused, of course, by the increased solar activity of the sun).  So the media switched.
 
I remember the news item on the CBS Evening News back around 1980 which helped to instigate the change in the designated boogie man of the left to Global Warming.  It was the featured, lead story of the night, a moment to shift the paradigm of propaganda.  The most salient point made in the report was, with a few degrees increase in annual, average temperatures, the Great Plains of the American Midwest would turn to deserts and the steppes of the Soviet Union would then become the bread basket of the world.  It contradicted articles like "The Cooling World" by Peter Gwynne in the April 28, 1975 edition of Newsweek on Global Cooling. 
 
I knew, that night, this new, equally baseless assumption would be blamed on mankind.  It would also give hope to the hopeless and provide a new belief system to those who believe in nothing, while possibly saving communism from its own ineptitude and the disaster of collectivist farming in the Soviet Union.  Collectivist farming caused real, man made famines, resulting in the death by starvation of over 20,000,000 people after it was forced on the Soviets by Stalin through government edict starting in 1928.
 
We've had to put up with the same bull, different package, ever since.  Compare the predictions cited in "The Cooling World" and the present hysteria.  "The Cooling World" also predicted possible famines, which never occurred.  The premises are polar opposites, a half a degree decrease in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968 and a half a degree increase cited by Al Gore and others in the more recent past, bringing us back to around the temperature levels of 1940 as cited by Denis Dutton's intro to the article from www.denisdutton.com.  If both premises are in fact accurate, aren't we actually suffering from Global Homeostasis (not the new gathering mantra of Climate Change) where overall temperatures really haven't changed, based on a longer time line?  But that would take away the news media's obsession of the moment.
 
P.S. Check out Denis Dutton's new website Climate Debate Daily for more information and expamples of the news media's predictions, going back to the New York Times warning of a possible new ice age in 1895.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »