About Me

Name: Marked in Pgh
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Yellow Journalism and Black Red Necks

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Friday, October 16, 2009 1:01:57 PM
Rush was set up, slandered, libeled and denied "minority status" ownership in the Rams.  This scam was concocted for us by the mountebanks of yellow journalism and enthusiastically joined by the red neck adherents of mechanized racism-Jess Jackson and the Irrelevant Charlatan and other pretenders to Martin Luther King.  They all jumped on the Rush Bashing Bandwagon to drum up business (when it's not being employed for selling the snake oils of other liberal quackery).
 
All they needed were manuufactured, incendiary comments Rush never made and never investigated by the Pravda Press.  Fact checking, after all, is supposed to be their job; a job they refuse to do because it conflicts with their real job of ongoing subterfuge.  Professional Black Red Necks like Jackson and Sharpton simply go with part of their stock and trade-prejudging white conservatives and promoting their own red neck agenda. 
 
In my life, some of the biggest racists I have ever met are black.  They are true red necks, deluded racists wallowing in ignorance and relying on their supposed superiority.  Many of the other major league racists I have met are liberal whites, who make equally racist comments as black red necks, using the "N" word in a liberal fashion in private they would never own up to while propagandizing their liberal lies in public.  It's called hypocracy and comes from the Greek and means someone who plays a part, a pretender. 
 
The Left are two faced, suffering from their own galloping paranoia and inferiority complexes, just like their favorite sociopath Stalin: who was the first editor of Pravda and played his part at factitious normalcy.  That all changed, eventually and after he took over the Soviet Union.  The truth never matters to the Left and other Communists, because the ends always justify the means.  Liberals keep their peccadilloes and major defects private and fabricate something else for their campaings in the Media.  Even Hitler lied about his racism, when he was running for Chancellor of Germay.  He was just a racist and a Leftist Socialist before and after that campaign.  The same can be said of Obama.
 
How did this start?  Rush was approached by a representative of a group of investors who wanted to bid on the purchase of the Rams.  They offered him a chance to become a limited partner in their group.  Limited partners have limited liability and are only at risk for the actual money they invest in the partnership.  Rush would be precluded from having anything to do with the running of the Rams if the partnership's offer was the winning bid for the NFL franchise.  He would only help pay the freight from the wages of his labor, but would not be allowed to dine at the master's table, unlike Jackson, Wright & Sharpton.
 
Rush knew the implication of his "minority status" and asked the representative if his group was ready for the predictable political firestorm.  He was assured the group of investors would back him up.  They didn't and then asked him to withdraw.  He told them to fire him from the group and that is what they did, after asking him to join them in the first place.
 
Limbaugh, one of the wealthiest self-made men in America and an accredited investor many times over, simply saw the transaction as a good investment when he signed on, before getting burned.  What did he have to lose, except the money he was investing?  That is, before the Media and the black red neck manufactured storm? 
 
It has turned into a big waste of time and America's attention as the Federal government is trying to nationalize one sixth of our economy.  It became a convenient and distracting sideshow to the freak show of the Obama Nation's grab for another segment of the private sector.  The health care industry comprises the largest and healthiest portion of the local economy here in Pittsburgh and its nationalization would cripple the region and the country.  But what does the Federal government, the Left and the red necks care about those outcomes or the truth? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The News Media Ignores 9/12 Part II

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:15:07 PM
The News Media continues to ignore 9/12, its scope and nature.  The event was only announced under the fold on the front page of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, with the article appearing on page A-9.  The article itself was a reprint of one from the Scarlet Harlot, the New York Times and was written by Jeff Zeleny.  Its title was "Obama, Congress targeted", with the subtitle "Tens of thousands attend broad protest of government in nation's capital".
 
If it was a broad protest of government, how could there only be "tens of thousands" of protesters?  And how could Zeleny than state in the article and I quote "but the magnitude of the rally took the authorities by surprise, with throngs of people streaming from the White House to Capital Hill for more than three hours".  How can that be the result of merely "tens of thousands" of protesters being at the rally?  The distance from the White House to Congress is a mile, and the protesters were streaming from one end to the other for three hours and filled Pennsylvania Ave..  But the Times ran with an earlier estimate of the protest made well before the rally occurred by the authorities.  These are the same authorities who are used to policing rallies by the Left and the Obama Coronation.  Yet they were surprised by the magnitude and compostition of the attendees at the march.  The Scarlet Harlot simply ignored the facts and did not update the estimate to fit with the reality of the turnout; and since the rest of the Gobblist Press merely parrots what the New York Times says, the misinformation was broadcast again while the Press ignored the facts; as it usually does, and did not do their job.  The Post-Gazette merely reprinted the article.
 
On the same day, Sunday September 13, 2009, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the other hyphenated but conservative local paper ran an article above the fold titled "Protesters take D.C. by storm" but with the subtitle of "Tens of thousands march in opposition to Obama's agenda".  The aritcle was a reprint of an article written by Mark Z. Barabar of the Los Angeles Times.  The times are changing and the  New York and L.A. Times are both suffering from, dare we say, declining circulation.  Perhaps the lack of blood is effecting their perception of the world and the truth.
 
As an example, Barabar also makes the contradictory observation "....the demonstrators filled Pennsylvania Avenue and swarmed the Capitol grounds with a sea of bobbing palcards and hand-lettered signs that spelled out a catalog of dissent".  Yes, that's right, dissent, peaceful, widespread and active dissent by well over, dare we even mention, a million, perhaps two million people?  If the attendees at the rally swarmed the Capitol grounds while filling Pennsylvania Ave., then could there could have been as many as two million American citizens at the rally?  It's very probable, even with the misinformation of the fourth estate.  
 
By ignoring the magnitude and scope of the rally, minimizing its size and its significance of exemplifying the free exercise of public speech and then emphasizing the misleading number of protesters, the News Media are in fact ignoring 9/12.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignoring History-The Media Ignores 9/12

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Sunday, September 13, 2009 12:42:52 PM
For Gibb to say Obama didn't know about the 9/12 March proves they're terrified.  This goes beyond denial, it turns the Obama adminstration, and by extension the News Media and the Goebblist Press, into ancient Greeks; who killed the bearer of bad news.  It also means reality is pounding on the front door of the asylum to announce that their self-directed play time inside is over.  It's now time to face what they have unleashed.  The Goebblist Media will do their best to minimize what happend yesterday in Washington, by ignoring 500,000 to a 1,000,000 everday Americans marching on Washington and demanding to be heard*.  This all began with some people near the start of the year caling for Tea Parties across the country.  That was all it took.
 
The reason the Left thought they could get away with this monumental and systematic destruction of America was because they thought they could ignore the tax paying majority and impose a Communist dictatorship on us all; convinced we were cowed by political correctnes and liberal dribble and too afraid to respond in any substantial way.  They did not figure the dynamics of a free people to rise up against tyranny like our ancestors.  We are still Americans, not an easily seperated compound of differing, petty and contesting victim group whith hyphons before American.  We are Americans, we and America existed before the Federal government.  The Federal government had nothing to do with the founding of this country, they are only the lunatics in the asylum within the Washington beltway.  America was founded by rebelious Americans with liberty in their hearts, minds and lives.  We, their intellectual and economic descendents, needed only one more reminder of the growing threat of the Federal government to inspire us to action.  That one reminder is the present configuration in Washington, and we can change that in just over a year. 
 
Next week, there will be two more demonstrations.  One will be a three days of the people peacefully assembling, as they did yesterday in the capital, and peacefully petition the government again in the Values Conference.  The other will be when the lunatics street thugs will descend on and destroy my home city of Pittsburgh during the G-20 meetings and turn it into a pig pen like Woodstock. 
 
Will the demostrations in Pittsburgh descend into mindless rioting?  Judging by their track record in London and Seatle, it's very likely.  I will not be able to go to Washington next week, nor was I able to attend yesteday's rally on 9/12; but I ask those who have to work during those two days of G-20 in downtown Pittsburgh to take their cameras with them and record the antics of the lunatics in the street.  
 
I will see if I can get down there as well.  The city's plans for access to downtown are still not complete and I don't work in downtown Pittsburgh and may not be allowed in, unless I'm with a sanctioned group of leftists.  If I am, I might be wearing a Sears poncho, as apposed to a real poncho, to protect myself from the "Cosmic Debris" Frank Zappa warned us about.  But be warned, don't get too close, they will probably be using biological war and spraying human waste around and throwing stones. And don't get near Starbuck's, their idea of the center of evil capitalism in the world.  I told you they're loons.  Take pictures of them from the windows of your office buildings and post them on the web.  Show the world what we are up against and what we will defeat.
 
*P.S. It seems the estimates for the 9/12 event are actually larger than the first ones I heard about.  ABC (Always Been Communist according to a Rush caller I heard once) actually screwed up (but only for a moment) and reported the number was 1,500,000 people.  They later conformed to the 'tens of thousands" mantra/lie of the moment as set by the New York Times (more on their article later).  Now I hear it was closer to 2,000,000.  So, to put it into plain words, we are talking about more than two million people out of a country of three hundred and thirty million people.  It's comparable to or greater than the two million who showed up for Obama's coronation.  The times they are a changing.  That's five times as many as showed up for the Million Man March, or 400,000-a march Obama helped to organize as a community organizer.   Even at 1,000,000 it's more than twice the size of the Civil Rights March of 1963.  It was simply the people peacefully assembling to petition the government, not insame rioters.  It was certainly bigger than August of 1968.  More on that as well.  Again, thank you for your comments and your support.   
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Prejean Should Press On

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:05:58 PM
Now that she has paid the price of freedom of speech by losing her title, Miss Prejean should continue to speak up and not be intimidated by the Left.  The Left always oversteps their bounds, loses their collective mind and makes fools of themselves.  If anyone has failed here, it is the Left, by being unable to convince the most liberal state (and soon to be first bankrupt) of California to vote for gay marriage.  Gay marriage is as illusory an oxy moron as liberal compassion.  Since they could not attack the State of California, they attacked a symbol of it.  But that symbol, Miss California, was not a dumb California blond. 
 
Miss Prejean simply stated her beliefs, and for that she has been punished.  This is now her badge of honor, by standing up against what the Media wants everyone to think is popular opinion, wrapped up as who is popular and who is not.  On Google's title page, Prejean's article was accompanied by what the Left wants us to believe is popular.  These consisted of pictures and comments in the margins about celebrities. 
 
The price of celebrity is too high today.  To be "popular" is to hide your beliefs, if you have any at all.  For actors and other entertainers who obsess about their popularity, the price is not that great; for they are changelings by nature and rarely stand for anything.  Miss Prejean has a great future ahead of her as an independent minded American. She has spoken and so have the majority of the people of California, despite what they are supposed to think.
 
The Left needs to remember the limitations of their own propaganda in popular culture.  Oscar Wilde was a celebrity in his time and would be considered politically correct today who observed "Everthing that is popular is wrong". 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Press-A Paine to the Left

Posted by Marked in Pgh on Monday, December 08, 2008 6:39:55 PM
What can we do as individual citizens, as individual bloggers after the election?  We continue being who we are, individual voices of liberty, dissent, opinion and thought.  We become the pamphleteers and the New Press of our age, like some of the Founders, including Tom Paine, against the people in power.  It's an American tradition, and our right.
 
Long before the creation to the Constitution, it was our God given right of dissent, protected and backed up later on by the freedom of the press clause in the first Amendment.  Thomas Paine was very argumentative with the other Founding Fathers and pulled no punches.  He even questioned the legitimacy of George Washington's birth.
 
Today, no one can take freedom of speech or of the press from us, unless we allow ourselves to be overwhelmed.  We are not overwhelmed, we are not intimidated.  We are Americans and this is our country.  We have the right to disagree and state our opinions and views.  We are not subjects of the Federal government.  We are the owners of the government and nothing shall subvert us to something the people of America brought about after they won their independence through armed revoution, to create "a more perfect Union".  The more perfect Union can not be the agent of our own repression.
 
So, we keep on writing; we keep on on pointing out the blind sides, the blind spots in the News Media coverage as proponents of the New Pamphleteers, the New Media and the New Press.  Congress can threaten to pass draconian new laws, but "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press".  We do not need the interpretation of the courts for language so plain and unambiguous.  Any laws passed by Congress which violates the First Amendment are null and void and we are not beholden to them.  If there was ever a moment for civil disobedience, it will be when these unconstitutional laws are imposed.
 
Will we prevail?  We, as Americans, are a naturally rebellious people.  The impostition of new taxes by the British Crown without representation of those imposed upon, resulted in the creation of a new country.  A tax on whiskey led to the Whiskey Rebellion here in the Pittsburgh area, at that time the frontier, against George Washington's own administration.  Prohibition was widely ignored by the American people living under this unenforceable constitutional amendment.  That fact can be seen by comparing two statistics.  How many speakeasies existed in America during Prohibition?  The answer, about the same number as the number of bars which existed in America before Prohibition.
 
Even the Soviet Union could not change the economic behavior of the oppressed and enslaved so-called Soviet citizenry.  It only drove such behavior underground and created a huge black market as the people reacted to the natural economic laws of unlimited demands pursuing limited supplies.
 
Free enterprise allows free individuals to exchange goods and services among themselves in order to satisfy their needs in free markets.  Any constrictions on these activities, arbitrarily imposed by the government, are disturbances in normal activities and create artificial limitations to the best utilization of goods and services.  Free enterprise is very democratic in its economic dynamics.  Central planning is oppressive, unresponsive and tyrannical in its distortions within any economy and society imposed upon.  This is just as true concerning the free exchange of ideas, political dissent and thought.
 
No matter how many degrees liberals in government have printed on parchment and hung on their walls; all these overeducated experts can do is to fleece the people in order to have more sheepskins to print their additional degrees and decrees upon.  None of them could ever come up with the idea of, or implement the plan for something like Federal Express, McDonald's, Wendy's, Hewlett Packard, Dell, Apple Computers or the E.I.B. Network.  The potential of the individual living in freedom is infinite.  The potential of government bureaucracies is limited by the mental disorders of its entrenched bureaucrats.
 
We are the entrepreneurs of free thought.  We are the New Press.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »